001 19661
002 7
004 6993CE97-EA2E-4170-9A66-76EA465FFDF5
005 201708191714
008 081223s2016||||vm|#################vie#d
009 1 0
039 ## $a20170819171233 $bminhkhue $y20170526101729 $zminhkhue
082 ## $a420 $bPH-T
100 $aPhạm, Thu Trang
245 ## $aA study on English politeness strategies for refusals with reference to Vietnamese equivalents / $cPhạm Thu Trang; NHDKH Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lê Văn Thanh
246 ## $aNGHIÊN CỨU CHIẾN LƯỢC LỊCH SỰ ĐỐI VỚI LỜI TỪ CHỐI TRONG TIẾNG ANH ĐỐI CHIẾU VỚI TIẾNG VIỆT
260 ## $aH. : $bViện Đại Học Mở Hà Nội, $c2016
300 ## $a76tr. ; $cA4
520 ## $aThe major aim of the study is to identify and explain the choice of politeness strategies for refusals in English and Vietnamese in terms of cross cultural interactions. In addition, the second aim is to contribute some suggestions in teaching and learning English as the second language. The study was completed by several means of main methods: Analytic and synthetic method, descriptive and statistic method, contrastive method. This thesis has contributed some research results: Firstly, although the English and Vietnamese tended to make similar choices in using the most preferred strategies, they displayed two opposing trends in using the number of strategies to refuse the people in different relative power and social distance. The English used more strategies to refuse to same relative power and social distance people than to opposite relative power and social distance ones. The reverse result was found for the Vietnamese; the greater number of strategies was used to refuse opposite relative power and social distance people instead of same relative power and social distance ones. Secondly, it is admitted that English were likely to be more direct than the Vietnamese. Finally, the distinction in the degree of directness between male and female English as not as great as between male and female Vietnamese. In other words, Vietnamese was strongly influenced by the relative power and social distance.
653 ## $aPoliteness strategies
653 ## $arefusals
653 ## $arelative power
653 ## $asocial distance
852 ## $a01 $bKho Luận văn $j(1): 01501384
856 1# $uhttp://thuvien.hou.edu.vn/houkiposdata1/luanvanluanankhoaluan/luanvan/2016/420/phamthutrang/phamthutrang_01thumbimage.jpg
890 ## $a1 $c1