001 23128
002 7
004 7D08C73D-E7DE-4ED8-A17F-3AF82D5DCD01
005 202012281505
008 081223s2020||||vm|#################vie#d
009 1 0
039 ## $a20201228000541 $bdtmkhue $y20201129191329 $zdtmkhue
082 ## $a420 $bTR-T
100 $aTrần, Văn Thuật
245 ## $aJudges’ Criticisms in The Voice of America and The Voice of Vietnam TV Singing Contests from Cross-cultural Perspective / $cTrần Văn Thuật; Supervisor: Dr. Huynh Anh Tuan
246 ## $aLời phê bình của giám khảo chương trình Giọng hát Mỹ và Giọng hát Việt nhìn từ góc độ giao tiếp văn hóa
260 ## $aH. : $bTrường Đại học Mở Hà Nội, $c2020
300 ## $a84 tr. ; $cA4
490 ## $aMinistry of Education and Training; Hanoi Open University
520 ## $aResearch purposes: This research aims to (1) identify the criticizing strategies employed by the judges in The Voice of America and The Voice of Vietnam TV singing contests, (2) find out the similarities and differences between criticizing strategies employed by the judges in The Voice of America and The Voice of Vietnam singing contests from cross-cultural perspective. Methods of the study: This research used qualitative and quantitative approaches. Qualitative approach was used to describe and analyze the data, and quantitative method was also employed in this research to obtain the frequency of the data occurrences in order to support the qualitative interpretation. The data were in the form of utterances containing criticism uttered by the judges in The Voice of America and The Voice of Vietnam TV singing contests in the years of 2018 and 2019. The data were analyzed based on Nguyen (2005)’s framework of criticizing strategies and explained based on Hofstede (1980)’s and Hall (1990)’s theories on culture. Results of the study: The results of the research show that the judges in both The Voice Shows applied all the strategies namely direct, indirect and combined strategies when giving criticisms. However, due to cultural differences, the American judges tend to use the direct strategies more frequently than the Vietnamese judges, who mainly applied indirect strategies. This study also suggests some implications for better understanding and giving criticisms in English and Vietnamese. Conclusion: The thesis has concentrated on investigating the strategies used by the judges in The Voice of America and The Voice of Vietnam TV Singing Contests when giving criticisms and poiting out the similarities and differences between the use of criticizing strategies from cross-cultural perspective. In general, the research questions have been satisfactorily answered and the the author basically reached the set aims. However, during the making of the thesis, shortcomings and mistakes are inevitably unavoidable. As a result, suggestions for further studies have been provided.
653 ## $acriticism
653 ## $across-cultural communication
653 ## $aspeech acts
653 ## $aThe Voice
852 ## $a01 $bKho Luận văn $j(1): 01502775
856 1# $uhttp://thuvien.hou.edu.vn/houkiposdata2/luanvanluanankhoaluan/luanvan/2020/420/tranvanthuat/tranvanthuat_001thumbimage.jpg
890 ## $a1 $c1